Medvedev responded to Biden’s words about the START treaty with the question “do we need it?”


“There is no need to negotiate with them yet. Instructions Pro International logistics in 2022: how goods are imported into Russia now Articles Pro Orders from foreign stores still come. Otherwise, it looks like this: they give us— solid abominations, and we— here, please, the nuclear deal, & mdash; he wrote in Telegram. Deputy Chairman of the Security Council Medvedev questioned the need for a new arms treaty with the United States Earlier, Biden announced that the United States was ready to negotiate with Russia on a new arms control system that would replace the START-3 Treaty
Dmitry Medvedev
Deputy Chairman of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev, commenting on US President Joe Biden's statement about his readiness to discuss a new arms control system with Moscow, pointed out that Russia is unlikely to need it now. At the same time, he also noted that now “the most inappropriate” time for new negotiations. And they will crawl with this topic. The world has become different, — added Medvedev, responding to Biden's proposal. Much worse! August 1, Biden said that the White House is ready to negotiate with Russia on an arms control system that will replace the expiring in 2026 Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (START -3). They crawled,— Medvedev said. Is this normal or should I call an ambulance? Let them run or crawl themselves and ask for it. “All this, of course, is good. How it works Articles Pro Anger, disgust and debriefing: why talking about sex is so difficult Instructions Pro “I would be disgusted with myself at 20”: how Bill Gates rests Articles Pro Living to 120 years: why the co-founder of PayPal takes a hormone growth Articles Pro Anti-sanctions “plastic”: where is it better to draw up an international card Articles Pro The price of gold has drawn a “death cross”. Authors Tags Persons
Dmitry Medvedev
politician , ex-president, deputy head of the Security Council of Russia
September 14, 1965

Источник rbc.ru In early June, Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control Mallory Stewart said that Washington would like to maintain nuclear arms restrictions under START-3 after the treaty expires. The politician wrote about this in his Telegram channel. And we are not to blame for it. The Kremlin then stated that it was impossible to avoid a dialogue on the extension of the treaty, and it was necessary to discuss the extension of START-3 “yesterday”. Russia and the United States concluded the START-3 treaty in 2010 for ten years, it entered into force in 2011. The agreement expired on February 5, 2021, shortly before that, Moscow and Washington extended it for five years— until February 5, 2026. Now the situation is much worse than the cold war. “A little over a month ago, I wrote that strategic security issues are extremely important for the Americans, which cannot be resolved without us. The agreement provided for the reduction of each of the parties deployed nuclear warheads to 1500, and intercontinental ballistic missiles, ballistic missiles of submarines and strategic missile-carrying bombers— up to 700. “And this discussion is important not only for the peoples of our two countries, but for the whole world, for global security,” — Dmitry Peskov, press secretary of the President of Russia, said. According to her, the new agreement should take into account not only intercontinental ballistic missiles, but also projectiles with a shorter range. And most importantly… Do we really need it? And they appreciate it as a special favor. However, I will reiterate. Medvedev then said that the extension of the agreement would depend on the decision of Russian President Vladimir Putin. This is bad for Russia. Read on RBC Pro Pro I have low blood pressure. Here you go. The American president then pointed out that even at the height of the Cold War, the US and the USSR worked together to fulfill the common responsibility of ensuring strategic stability.